Jan 23, 2011

mercy for the oceans (recipe: shrimp primavera with broccoli and olives)



I'm reading a book, the title of which will probably make some of my readers cringe: Eating Animals by Jonathan Safran Foer. Why am I reading this? Why why why...?

When I went vegan I instituted an unspoken moratorium against consuming the gory details of animal agriculture. I just couldn't handle it. I sobbed my way through Peaceable Kingdom and never could commit to that old standby, Meet Your Meat. A couple of years ago, a video circulated of a calf being born on the slaughter line. If you know what I'm talking about, you know what I'm talking about. If you don't, count yourself lucky. You can never un-see something like that.

Because I was vegan, I felt that I didn't need any more information about what happens in animal factories. I'd made the ultimate decision; I was no longer complicit. And when Eating Animals was released, I was still a vegetarian, so I didn't consider reading it. I simply did not need to be exposed to even more information that would make me even more ashamed to be a human being. But when I came across it at the library a few days ago, I decided to pick it up. Maybe I wanted to test myself. Maybe I wanted to see if I could be driven into vegetarianism again by the stark, destructive truths of the crimes committed in animal factories, or if I would simply feel relieved that I've found some semblance of a third way.

Nothing in this book is new to me. The difference between broilers and layers, and what happens to billions of male layer-types, and why the designations of "cage-free" and "free-range" are meaningless, and the calves who become veal, and the "wasted" dairy cows who become hamburger meat, and manure lagoons, and E. coli O157:H7, and sow crates, and stun tanks, and hide-rippers, and manipulations of light and feed, and why grain is bad for cows, and the destruction of the Amazon, and human rights abuses, and ammonia baths, and downers -- I'm aware of these horrors, as everyone should be.

I go far out of my way to support farms where these abuses do not occur. Still, there is a hard kernel of stubbornness in me that protests that any unnecessary death is a bad death. Probably there is less death in my pastured local pork than in my organic regional rice. But I have moments of hesitation every single time I eat meat.

So what am I getting out of this book? I'm halfway through, and I have to stop every few pages to breathe through my anger and disgust. But he has not yet admitted the cruelty inherent in a monocropped field of annual plants -- the animals destroyed, the soil destroyed, the cultures destroyed by mass dependency on industrial agriculture as a whole. I feel confident that he will end this book on behalf of vegetarianism, and while I can certainly relate to the impetus, I must protest the lack of attention paid to the other side of the equation.

But I must also question eating fish. Foer's got me there.

I can't decide how to explain this. Should I rattle off some horrifying, mind-numbing statistics? Okay, here are a few. It's likely we will see the collapse of edible stocks in our lifetime. On shrimp trawling operations, 80-90% of captured sea creatures are tossed overboard to die. Almost 150 different species of shark, rays, mackerel, turtles, birds, dolphins, and whales, many of which are endangered, are destroyed in tuna extraction. Tons upon tons of animals are pulled in on boats that only seek a single species. That's enough, I think. Unless you want to get into the issue of cruelty. Personally, I don't have the heart for it right now.

You might protest that you don't buy fish that is caught in such an unsustainable manner. But how do you know? Regulatory agencies are not to be trusted, and it's very difficult to find reliable information. When I buy pastured meat, I get to shake the hand of the person who raised those animals. I can see where the animals live and what they eat and even, if I wish, how they die. I live only an hour from the coast but I doubt this transparency is possible on even the most sustainable fishing operation. And on even the most eco-conscious operation I believe I'd find fish stomped to death, or allowed to die slowly over many hours; I might see an instrument resembling a pickax swung into fishes' living faces to pull them aboard.

It's nearly impossible to take responsibility -- to choose carefully, with consciousness -- for consumption of seafood. I've been fooling myself for some time that doing a quick search on Seafood Watch is enough. It's not. It's equatable to embracing the cage-free label -- hook, line, and sinker.

 So this might be my last seafood recipe. Not because it makes any difference for one person to boycott the industry, but because I just don't feel comfortable with all of the unknowns. Believe me, I wish I did. I love seafood. It was the hardest thing, the last thing, I gave up as a vegetarian. But I can't be complicit in the wholesale destruction of the oceans any more than I can support the modern CAFO. Let me know if that makes any sense.


Shrimp Primavera with Broccoli and Olives
12 oz. pasta (I use brown rice penne)
3 T. pastured butter
2 T. olive oil
6 garlic cloves, sliced
1/2 red onion, sliced
1 c. cherry tomatoes, halved (canned tomatoes are fine; drain well)
1 1/2 c. plain whole-milk yogurt
1/2 c. Parmesan cheese, shredded
1 lb. large shrimp, peeled
1 head broccoli, chopped into florets
1 c. mixed olives, sliced if you wish

Set a large pot of water to boil. Heat the butter and oil in a large, deep skillet over medium heat. Add the garlic and onion and cook until soft. Add the tomatoes, yogurt, and cheese. Let simmer for 10 minutes.

Meanwhile, put the pasta in the pot with a pinch of salt. Pack the broccoli into a steamer basket and suspend it over the pasta pot. Cover the steamer basket and steam the broccoli until bright green and just barely soft, about 8 minutes. Remove the broccoli basket and continue to cook the pasta according to package instruction. Drain the pasta and set aside.

Stir the shrimp into the cream mixture and cook for 3-5 minutes, until pink and beginning to curl up. Add the broccoli and pasta and stir to combine. Taste and add salt and black pepper as needed.

Scoop out the primavera onto plates and sprinkle olives over the top along with a fresh grating of Parmesan.

8 comments:

The Casual Vegan said...

I totally understand why people reject industrial meat. It's just so rare to read about someone paying attention to industrial fishing practices.

As a fisherman's son, I had to experience the depleted fish stocks first hand 20+ years ago. There simply isn't enough fish for boats to catch unless you go deep into the ocean or to places like Alaska.

It's only a matter of time before all fish is farmed. I'm personally shocked that ocean fishing still turns a profit.

cc said...

Thank you for keeping me on my toes. I know I should be more invested in researching myself, but when I have you to trust and give the good info, it's hard to willingly expose myself to the horrific details. Even hearing about the calf on the slaughter line made me tear up.

We eat too much meat. And even though it's from the best sources we have available to us here, it's still too much. I'm hoping to do better. I'm not sure what to do about the little fish we eat though. On the increasingly rare occasions that we eat out, I feel like it's still a better option than the meat if we can't get good vegetarian, but that's just another excuse. I'll admit I'm less inclined to be emotional about seafood, but I'm sure that's just a product of willful ignorance.

Would you consider doing a list of foods that represent the best options from your various perspectives? I know, I'm lazy.

Chandelle said...

TCV,

That's the problem right there. As invisible as industrial farming may be, industrial fishing is a hundred times more so. Some of us may live near a factory farm -- there's a feedlot in my parents' neighborhood in Gilbert, AZ -- but almost nobody is exposed to fishing on a mass scale. It's simply unknown to us, and mostly unknowable.

Aquaculture gets a bad rap, but if done carefully, and with selective species, I think it could be a sustainable protein source. Integrated aquaculture systems are amazing in their ingenuity, but they're not yet implemented on a mass scale. As for existing large-scale aquaculture, it's rife with problems, and even the most "sustainable" operations have dubious practices like feeding fish corn and soybean meal.

Wild-caught fish seems higher in important nutrients, but also more prone to contamination and chemical accumulation, and it's hard to justify continuing to eat these popular species when they're struggling for survival and our technologies are ever more desperately exploitative (Foer refers to it as a war).

It's very difficult for me to see an upside to any of this -- with some effort I can get those nutrients elsewhere. So for now it seems best to avoid fish altogether.

cc,

On eating too much meat -- that's difficult to quantify. I believe in ultra-localized eating, and that means a regional diet. If your area can support a very broad diet, then so be it. But if there isn't much else available in the winter, I can't believe it's better to have fresh vegetables, out-of-season fruits, or monocropped grains shipped in from all over the world.

Animals in small-scale, multi-use farms are integral to the health of that land, and eating them is essentially blameless from an ecological standpoint -- certainly it's preferable above apples from New Zealand or soy from South America. I am a huge believer in seasonal eating and maybe that means more meat in the winter, according to what animals can be integrated into your environment, as well as various preserved and stored foods.

I'm certainly less inclined to feel kindly toward sea creatures, but I still couldn't get through the documentary ~The End of the Line~ because I couldn't stand to see what was happening to those fish. And the cruelty was not even the point; it was incidental. So maybe there's just some soft squishy something in me that responds outrageously to violence, but it's difficult to justify it.

That said, I'm less rigid about this stuff when I'm eating out. I can't see that fighting about it makes much of a difference when we eat out so rarely. Maybe it's my slacktivist side speaking, but I think if you're doing your best to source your own food well, that's more than almost anyone is doing and certainly good enough.

What do you mean by a list of foods?

cc said...

I guess I'd like to see what your resources for your perspectives are (if you have them) on the major hot items of the day. Especially the GF ones. Quinoa, buckwheat, teff...

I'm trying to find the balance between what works for me and my family's health without completely throwing out local eating. I'm not good at sticking to a local diet because of the restrictions on fresh food here in the winter, but I wish I could be. I've been wondering lately how our bodies are meant to handle the seasons with vitality, and while I think increased meat in the winter is okay, aside from preserved produce, I can't think of what else we would eat to get nutrients. I don't like the idea of vitamin supplements in general, but without fresh fruit and vegetables, I don't see an alternative.

Though I am interested in getting closer to the ideal. It's one of the reasons we keep the house as cold as we can stand it in the winter and as warm as we can handle in the summer, to keep our bodies in tune with the season. But I have no idea if this has any validity to it and how our bodies process or if it really makes a difference.

I'm getting better (and lucky) at finding local sources for my favorite grain alternatives and dried beans though, even if they aren't natural to the area (is that a problem?) And I'd also like to think that I shouldn't need coconut oil in a place where it can't grow, but if I live by that code, I'd have to move tropical because it just feels so much better to eat this way. And lemons! What would I do without lemons?

I do fully believe that small local agriculture and meat is the large scale answer and that it solves a lot of problems that are worth solving, but what if it doesn't solve MY problems. Are canned vegetables and fruits really good enough to carry us through half the year? Sorry, selfish and long winded, but it's been on my mind and I've needed a place to unload my thoughts.

beautiful pencil said...

yum, yum! gonna make this right away

Chandelle said...

Hope you like it, bp!

Those are good questions, cc. Maybe I'll do a post on the challenges of local eating in the winter. For now I can assume that Idaho is a good place to find root vegetables in addition to your existing sources of meat and dairy. Greens, too, can be grown straight through a snowy winter, and when all else fails there are always sprouts. Nuts and seeds are good storage foods, and cultured foods of all types are good choices in the winter. For fruit, apples and pears can be stored all winter long, and frozen fruit is just fine, I think (though I've found that a lot of store-bought frozen fruit comes from as far away as Turkey).

I get a sense of defeat from your comments, but this a process. Process, process, process! Every year we can get a bit better at storing foods to eat through the winter so we can have nearly as much variety as we had during the summer. And we don't need to be so rigid as to eliminate every non-local thing we eat... But now my comment is extending into a whole post, so I'll just do that. :)

Christy said...

What a thought provoking post - lots to "chew on". I love your last fish recipe and bet it would taste wonderful with chicken. Thank you for linking this to the hearth and soul hop! (please link back to one of the hosts so everyone can share in the fun! - thanks!)

Chandelle said...

Christy, I do have a link on the bottom of the post... is that okay?